Saturday 31 March 2012

My first research interviews, Peckham 31/03/2012


After three attempts I realised something, that if I wanted more than 'sound bites' I was going about things the wrong way.  There is no way that some random stranger I approach on the streets will trust me enough or feel open enough to really think through the questions and answer honestly and deeply.  So for now I'm abandoning this approach.  Instead I will seek out people I know and ask the same questions but lengthen the discussion more.

For interests sake, here's my answers to the soundbite approach...

What does freedom mean to you?
The ability to be exactly who you are without shame, fear, persecution or abuse.

Do you feel free?
Not always, no.

When have you felt most free?
When I'm in the heart of a collective struggle - in the student demonstrations when we took over the streets of London, when I'm confronting abuse or injustice or standing up for myself and others.

Wednesday 28 March 2012

Migrations @ Tate Britain

Migrations @ Tate Britain

I was drawn to this exhibition because it fits perfectly with my exploration of migration, immigration - yearning to breathe free.

'Migrations', explores how migration into Britain has shaped the course of art in Britain of the last 500 years; from 16th century Flemish portrait painters to moving image works from the early years of this century.

The most interesting thing to me about the first 3 rooms (16th-19th century) was how much immigrant painters were accepted, encouraged and respected by the authorities (at that time the royal court).  In a time before strict border controls, visas and other assorted hoops to be jumped through it was possible for a struggling artist to find their way to Britain and develop their craft.  Now with strict border controls on any non-European people, it is almost impossible for new young artists to find their way to Britain and establish themselves developing their practice.  The only people who are given visa's are those artists with already established international reputation and sponsorship in the UK.  The work itself in this section of the exhibition was of course accomplished and brilliant but nowhere near as interesting as the art in later rooms.

Jewish Artists, Jewish Art and refugees from Nazi Europe: this was the first room where you started  to see a clear identity emerging from the paintings.  Jewish artists in the early part of the 20th Century started to paint and depict Jewish people and Jewish family life, something normally hidden from view. There was a huge diversity of art in this room with Jewish artists contributing to the emerging modernism; there were two beautiful plastic sculptures by Naum Gabo, balanced, complex forms rendered simple through the use of transparent material. 

It was in 1905 that the Aliens Act was enacted restricting Jewish and other immigration.  Though it wasn't discussed in the exhibition I know that the Jewish community played an important role in the emerging anti-fascist movement; they were clearly enmeshed and played a part in shaping British art as well.  This made me wonder at the lack of Irish art, I realised how few Irish artists I could name (apart from Francis Bacon who though born in Ireland, was practically English).  I know that Irish immigrants have played a pivotal role in British life from worker rights movements to anti fascist movements to Troops Out movements - why isn't this reflected in visual art or is it that Irish artists are overlooked in the art world? Something for me to research further and I will return to it in this blog.

The dematerialised object: this was a wonderful collection of pieces, from David Medalla's bubble machine sculpture (Cloud Canyons) to the video of Gustav Metzingers 'auto destructive' art.  There was a video recreation of an original performance by Metzinger where he stretched nylon on an enormous scaffold opposite St Paul's (interestingly, now the location of Tate Modern).  He proceeded to spray acid onto the fabric, slowly destroying it and revealing St Paul's. I loved the interactive, playful, experimental processes of the artists in this room.  Rasheed Araeens small 'lovers' sculpture was, similar to Gabos work, beautiful simplicity. 

The Lovers
The Lovers is a work that was originally intended to provoke direct interaction by the viewer, asking them to reconfigure the two parts of the sculpture how they wished.  It was an enormous shame that there was a clear "Due to the extreme fragility of the work the viewer is not permitted to move pieces here" sign.  For me that was very sad, how much better the work would have been if we could manipulate it, feel it, take part in it; I wonder why no one has ever thought of simply reconstructing the piece, keeping the original in some mausoleum of storage so its 'preciousness' can be guarded and allowing the viewers to actually experience the work as was intended.  If I sound annoyed, it's because I am.

For me, the stand out work in this exhibition was the video pieces, I took this quote form the exhibition wall:
"If migration, virtual or physical, temporary or ongoing, is increasingly a condition of contemporary life, the moving image is an apt medium for expressing this condition.  It captures motion and is itself endlessly transportable.  It can inhabit multiple forms at any scale or size while its temporal nature allows a picture to develop over time.  As an artwork, it exists only temporarily in the act of projection." 
This made me think about the 'endlessly transportable' sculptural projection screen I'm planning for my final piece and how happy I am to be working with film which I think exactly captures my theme.

I spent about 3 hours in this exhibition, a large part (almost an hour) was spent rapt in the Black Audio Film Collectives 'Harmondsworth Songs' (1986); A pioneering film essay in the aftermath of the riots in London, Liverpool and Birmingham in the 1980's. Sparked by police brutality & racism, the riots were germinated in the racism, cuts and attacks on the working class of the Thatcher era.  I was rapt by this film which weaved together media footage with real voices of the black and Asian communities (though at that time because there was such a strong anti-racist movement there was no such differentiation in the words black & Asian - black was a political term, defined as those non white people who faced racism).  I laughed out loud when one young Asian man stated how the government was willing to spend millions on bidding for the Olympics yet couldn't meet peoples basic needs for employment, education, heath and housing - sound familiar?  You could take directly some of the things being said then and play them in the wake of the recent riots and they would stand true.

Mona Hatoum's 'Measures of Distance' was a moving and powerful piece that combined pictures and text, recordings of conversations with her mother in Palestine with her reading her mothers letters aloud. Mona Hatoum is a Beirut born Palestinian exiled in the UK while her mother remains in Lebanon (where the family escaped to).  This piece was layers, upon, layers upon layers; fragmentation, sorrow and power - it engraved the pain of being exiled, the ache of distance and not knowing where you really belong.

Francis Aylis' 'Railings' (2004) is worth a mention for its simplicity and effectiveness.  Simply walking around various residential squares in London dragging a stick along the railings he created hypnotic increasingly complex sounds.  There was a group of teenagers on a school trip to the gallery who decided to add to the work with their clapping and stamping joyfully adding to the sound.
How Floating Coffins was presented
The final work I'll talk about and what I think was the best thing in this exhibition was a video piece by Zineb Sedira 'Floating coffins' (2009).  Shot in the harbour city of Nouadhibou, West Africa; home to the worlds largest ship graveyard as well as the departure point for West African immigrants hoping to reach the Canary Islands.  Presented on multiple different sized screens, placed from high up to low down with round balls (buoy's?) suspended from the ceiling on rope concealing multiple speakers; this work was as much about the presentation as the video.  From the start you are immersed in sound and visuals, the pictures moving across the screens, sometimes zoomed in on rusty hulls or the sea, at other times presenting a wide view of this haunting location.  Sometimes several images came together to form a bigger picture; my eye was constantly moving, never still , never fixed.

I recently saw a documentary on Hockney and his photography, he talked about his photo collages as forcing the viewer to look as they would normally look on a complex scene - our eyes do not stay fixed, we take in many things at once, looking at detail then the overall scene, then something else.... He felt that traditional photography forced the eye to do something it would not normally do, view something from one static viewpoint.  I was reminded of this with Sedira's work which never allowed my eye to stay still, it was sometimes frustrating because I thought I wanted to zoom in and take in the detail of just one of the beautiful shots, but actually isn't this frustration, constant movement, changing perspective's also part of the experience of migration?  This was a magical work that sent shivers down my spine; all at once beautiful, eerie, sad and full of colour, light and movement.

I'll finish with a quote not from this exhibition but from Don McCullin, whose photographs are on display at Tate Britain:
"Photography isn't looking, its feeling.  If you cant feel what you're looking at then you're never going to get others to feel anything when they look at your pictures"
 Wise words for an artist to live by, whatever the medium.


Postscript:  I did pop in to the Picasso exhibition which was an interesting from an art history perspective but couldn't hold a candle to Migrations for sheer power and impact.  I was disappointed but not surprised that Picasso was packed to the rafters whilst Migrations was virtually empty (nice for me though as I relished being able to leisurely take my time through the exhibition and sit for as long as I liked in front of the video works).








Sunday 25 March 2012

Brainwave in the wee hours... projection surface

BRAINWAVE IN THE WEE HOURS...

I couldn't sleep, tormented by thoughts of how on earth I would display my film in a way that felt right, was meaningful.  My worst nightmare is being trapped in one of those little corner spaces squeezed into the limited space we have in the college for our exhibition.  I know that space will be really limited and I need to be flexible about what space I use.  I also want the projection surface to be a part of the work - further fragmenting my image.

Here is my early hours scribbling...


What I will end up with is 8 boxes that can be configured in different ways, endlessly flexible and movable.  I have to decide on the material to be stretched on the boxes as a projection surface, I'm going to buy a range and experiment with different surfaces.  i might try and incorporate mirrors into the piece, further fragmenting the film and reflecting the viewer.

I also came up with the idea of hooking my old video camera up to an old portable TV, placing the TV behind one of the translucent screens and hiding the camera so that it is pointing at those viewing the work, placing the viewer in the work and alluding to the encroachment on our freedom in terms of Britain's prolific use of CCTV.

I worry that I may be getting far too complex and that the installation of this piece will require stripping back layers of complication to get to a visually clear piece that impacts the viewer.  This worry was confirmed when i started further obsessing about working a wedding dress into the piece as a projection surface!  I'm going to have a lot of ideas and material to play with when installing the final piece.

Ive put in my order for wood with the colleges technician and discussed with her how the boxes would be constructed.  I'd like to have the boxes constructed by the end of April.

Thursday 22 March 2012

Ideas for my video piece

Film Ideas

I have come up with a number of ideas for films which I'm hoping will come together into something that makes sense...

  • Using my original underwater self portraits as inspiration, I will film myself in the same way, struggling to stay under water then exploding from the water to catch a breath - sounds of water and breathing.  I'll experiment with my little underwater camera to see if I can get any interesting underwater shots.

  • Film close up of me putting bright red lipstick on my lips - I have to take steroids because of an immune system disorder and they make me grow masses of facial hair that Ive been allowing to grow for just this moment!  Challenging gender restrictions, notions of disgust & attraction - why should women be hairless everywhere but their head?  Interestingly, Ive been losing hair on my head while its growing at an alarming rate everywhere else!

  • Experiment filming my face & hands underwater with paint as nail varnish & make up so that the water slowly lifts and dissipates the paint into the water.

  • On London Bridge in rush hour, all in white, me sitting cross legged with my back to the oncoming hordes of office workers.  Reading the communist manifesto.  Possible a personal space circle in white chalk around me.  This is one of the ideas that could be filmed in Super 8 depending on the light conditions.

  • Sandy beach, me in extravagant 50's red dress - walking slowly into the water as far as I can go & back. Possibly Super 8?

  • Contorting my body to fit child size spaces - kids playground?

  • In same outfit as London Bridge in Trafalgar Square - walk slowly around the lips of the two water fountains.  This could also be Super 8.

Wednesday 21 March 2012

Water: Bill Viola & Leonardo

Sometime in the early 2000's, long before I thought I could even make art, I chanced upon Bill Viola's Five Angels for the Millennium in Tate Modern.  It was the most profound experience Id ever had in front of an artwork as an adult up till that moment (discounting seeing the James Martin depictions of Heaven, Hell & Purgatory as a child).

I am always drawn to water, whether still or stormy seas, gentle brooks, raging rivers, waterfalls or still ponds.  Maybe its because most of my childhood homes featured water: In Ireland; Clogga Bay, Arklow (at the mouth of the River Avoca), Brittas Bay, The Meetings of the Water (Avoka).  In Britain, Pimlico (on the bank of the Thames), the King William IV Pub, the place my family returned to 3 times, the main place in London we called home.

I can loose myself staring at water, immersing myself in the sounds and sensations.  Five Angels was like being completely immersed in all of those memories and feelings, it made my breath catch and my heart beat.  I sat in front of each screen several times, loosing track of time and left feeling elevated, lighter; up until that point I could never remember an artists name, that day and ever after, I remembered Bill Viola.

I found a quote from Leonardo DaVinci which expresses the enormity and significance of water wonderfully...

    "Water is sometimes sharp and sometimes strong, sometimes acid and sometimes bitter, sometimes sweet and sometimes thick or thin, sometimes it is seen bringing hurt or pestilence, sometime health-giving, sometimes poisonous.
    It suffers change into as many natures as are the different places through which it passes. And as the mirror changes with the colour of its subject, so it alters with the nature of the place, becoming noisome, laxative, astringent, sulfurous, salty, incarnadined, mournful, raging, angry, red, yellow, green, black, blue, greasy, fat or slim.

    Sometimes it starts a conflagration, sometimes it extinguishes one; is warm and is cold, carries away or sets down, hollows out or builds up, tears or establishes, fills or empties, raises itself or burrows down, speeds or is still; is the cause at times of life or death, or increase or privation, nourishes at times and at others does the contrary; at times has a tang, at times is without savor, sometimes submerging the valleys with great floods. In time and with water, everything changes"

    For more on Leonardo and water see: http://witcombe.sbc.edu/water/artleonardo.html

Tuesday 20 March 2012

Josiah McElheny at the Whitechapel Gallery

The Past Was A Mirage I'd left behind...


Honestly, the connection of this artists work with the history of the old Passmore Edwards Library (whose shell is now part of the Whitechapel Gallery) and its relationship to the Whitechapel Gallery reading room, was lost on me.  I get the theory (after researching it following my visit); that the former library's facade had unusually large windows for the time and it was to allow light and air into a public building as a 'lantern for learning', a library for all, not just the privileged.  Expressing the aspirations of enlightenment through glass and light. 

Great as all that is, the theory is not remotely important to enjoying this stunning installation.  What confronted me on entering the former reading room of the original Whitechapel library (now a raw brick shell) was amazing refractions of light and colour, my own reflection and the interaction between the seven separate structures and their environment.  Every step I took immersed me in new experiences, I could have spent hours in that room;sitting, standing, walking, looking from every possible angle.  In terms of its relationship to my work, I had been thinking of ways to refract and deconstruct my film through the use of different fabrics and frames; I like the sense of dislocation and immersion it creates.  I left the exhibition excited about the possibilities of combining sculpture and film.

Mc Elheny has constructed wood and projection cloth screens with mirrored panels and placed them throughout the room.  Each screen becomes the repository for a collection of abstract art films (not created by McElheny), endlessly reconfiguring and refracting the films on the different surfaces.  The viewer becomes part of the work, interrupting the projections, reflected and refracted in those same mirrors.

OK, truthfully, I am going to have to do a bit more reading to get my head around the theory and depth behind this work.  It has to do with modernism, the revolutionary potential of art and the failure of the modernist project.  I could regurgitate what Ive been reading; but I promised myself that I would not write anything that I didn't feel I thoroughly understood and could explain so others could understand - I'm not there yet with this work!  Keep checking back for a bit more 'intellectual engagement' with Mc Elhenys work.

Having said all that - go and see this exhibition, its mesmerising!


The Whitechapel Gallery website