I work with LGBT asylum seekers who are from countries where
being gay is criminalised. I was going
through one woman’s statement with her and asked her what it meant that she was
“got” at a “knock down price”. She
explained to me that after being caught in school with her lover she was beaten
and expelled, her father also beat her and she was kept a prisoner in the home
just carrying out domestic chores - all because she is a lesbian.
Her father ‘found’ her a husband who was ‘willing’ to take
her on, he was many years older than her; she was told she should be grateful
that anyone would have her. Because she
was such a bad deal, the price the man’s family had to pay to her family was
virtually nothing. She was forced into marriage and faced regular rape and
beatings until she escaped to Britain.
I’ve met so many women who have been forced into marriage,
sold off from father to husband; for them marriage is a prison, a constant
torture. The whole romantic notion of
marriage for love is historically a relatively new phenomenon. Historically marriage is more about
controlling a woman’s sexuality (e.g. ensuring paternity through exclusive
sexual access to one man) or about power and control (e.g. bringing together
families for reasons of money or status).
It was in the 12th Century that woman were obliged to take
the name of their husband.
A bride price is an
amount of money, property or wealth paid by the groom or his family to the
parents of a woman upon the marriage of their daughter to the groom. The agreed
bride price is generally intended to reflect the perceived value of the girl or
young woman.
I can’t help but balk at the whole idea of
marriage, I know for some it works and it has financial and practical benefits;
but I can’t get away from the history and the implications, the fact that women
still give up their name for their husbands (now through choice rather than
necessity) and the competition to have the biggest, most expensive wedding is just
repellent to me. The fact that now gay
marriage is being vaunted as the highest state of being for gay couples is
really annoying, while I support the right to marry, I do not consider it an
appealing thing!
All of this
imbues ‘the wedding dress’ with so much symbolism and meaning. In traveller communities the size of the
dress seems to correspond directly to how much value is placed on the young
woman getting married. It seems that for
all women entering marriage ‘the dress’ is one of the most important aspects of
the process, why is this?
No comments:
Post a Comment